IELTS Writing Task 2 · Opinion essay

Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2: Smokers can cause themselves serious health problems.

Đồng ý / không đồng ý 40 phút · tối thiểu 250 từ Bài mẫu 6.0 Bài mẫu 7.0 Bài mẫu 9.0 trong app

Đề bài

Smokers can cause themselves serious health problems. The choice to smoke is made freely and with knowledge of dangers.
Smokers should therefore expect to pay more for medical treatment than non-smokers.

To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Viết ít nhất 250 từ trong khoảng 40 phút.

Dàn ý gợi ý cho dạng Opinion essay

Xem tất cả đề dạng Opinion essay →

Đề hỏi bạn đồng ý đến mức nào (To what extent do you agree or disagree?). Bạn phải nêu quan điểm rõ ngay mở bài và giữ nhất quán đến kết bài.

  1. Mở bàiParaphrase đề + thesis statement nêu rõ mức độ đồng ý.
  2. Thân bài 1Lý do chính thứ nhất ủng hộ quan điểm, có giải thích và ví dụ.
  3. Thân bài 2Lý do thứ hai, hoặc nhượng bộ quan điểm ngược lại rồi phản biện.
  4. Kết bàiNhắc lại quan điểm bằng cách diễn đạt khác, không thêm ý mới.
  • Đừng viết "partly agree" nếu không giải thích được ranh giới.
  • Mỗi đoạn một ý chính, có câu chủ đề rõ.
  • Ví dụ cụ thể giúp tăng điểm Task Response.

Bài mẫu band 6.0

313 từ. Bài đủ ý, bố cục rõ, từ vựng và ngữ pháp ở mức an toàn: đây là mức nhiều bạn cần để đạt mục tiêu 6.0.

Smoking can cause serious health problems, such as lung cancer and heart disease. Some people believe that because smokers choose to smoke and know the dangers, they should pay more for their medical treatment than non-smokers. I partly agree with this statement, but I do not think it is a fair solution in every case.

On the one hand, there are some reasons to support this idea. Firstly, everyone knows that smoking is dangerous, because there are warnings on cigarette packets and in the media. If people still choose to smoke, they should take responsibility for the results of their choice. Secondly, treating smoking-related diseases costs a lot of money, and this money comes from taxes paid by everyone, including non-smokers. Some people think it is unfair that non-smokers have to pay for the unhealthy choices of smokers. Thirdly, if smokers have to pay more for treatment, some of them may decide to stop smoking.

On the other hand, I think there are some problems with this idea. Firstly, nicotine is very addictive, so many smokers want to stop but find it very difficult. Many people started smoking when they were teenagers, before they understood the dangers. Secondly, smokers already pay a lot of tax on cigarettes, which helps to pay for healthcare. Thirdly, if we make smokers pay more, we may also have to make other people pay more, such as people who drink alcohol, eat unhealthy food or do dangerous sports. This would be very difficult and unfair. In addition, it is hard to prove that an illness was caused only by smoking.

In my opinion, instead of making smokers pay more for treatment, the government should increase taxes on cigarettes and help smokers to quit.

In conclusion, I partly agree that smokers should take responsibility for their health, but I do not think they should pay more for medical treatment.

Bài mẫu band 7.0

321 từ. So với bài 6.0: lập luận sâu hơn, từ vựng chính xác và đa dạng hơn, câu phức dùng tự nhiên hơn.

Some people argue that, since smokers knowingly choose to damage their health, they should pay more for medical treatment than non-smokers. Although I understand the reasoning behind this view, I largely disagree with it, as it would be unfair, impractical and less effective than other ways of reducing smoking.

There are some arguments in favour of this proposal. The health risks of smoking are well known, and many people believe that adults who choose to smoke should accept responsibility for the consequences. Treating smoking-related illnesses such as lung cancer, emphysema and heart disease places a heavy financial burden on health systems, which are largely funded by taxpayers, most of whom do not smoke. Charging smokers more could therefore seem fairer and might also discourage people from starting or continuing to smoke.

However, I believe this idea has serious weaknesses. Firstly, the claim that smoking is a completely free choice is questionable. Nicotine is highly addictive, and most smokers began as teenagers, often under the influence of peer pressure or advertising, before they fully understood the risks. Many would like to quit but struggle to do so. Secondly, smokers already contribute substantially to the cost of healthcare through the high taxes on tobacco products, which in many countries exceed the cost of treating smoking-related diseases. Thirdly, the principle would be difficult to apply consistently. If smokers were charged more, the same logic could be applied to people who drink alcohol, eat unhealthy diets, avoid exercise or take part in dangerous sports, which would undermine the principle of universal healthcare. It would also be difficult to prove that a particular illness was caused by smoking.

Còn 2 đoạn của bài 7.0 và bài mẫu band 9.0

Đăng nhập miễn phí để đọc trọn bài, so sánh 3 mức band và viết thử ngay trên đề này.

Đọc tiếp trong app