IELTS Writing Task 2 · Two-part question

Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2: The costs of medical health care are increasing all the time.

Đề hai câu hỏi và dạng khác 40 phút · tối thiểu 250 từ Bài mẫu 6.0 Bài mẫu 7.0 Bài mẫu 9.0 trong app

Đề bài

The costs of medical health care are increasing all the time. Governments are finding it difficult to balance the health care budget.

Should citizens be totally responsible for their own health costs and take out private health insurance, or is it better to have a comprehensive health care system which provides free health services for all? Discuss.

Viết ít nhất 250 từ trong khoảng 40 phút.

Dàn ý gợi ý cho dạng Two-part question

Xem tất cả đề dạng Two-part question →

Đề có hai câu hỏi riêng (ví dụ Why is this happening? Is it a positive development?) hoặc yêu cầu đặc biệt. Phải trả lời đầy đủ cả hai câu hỏi.

  1. Mở bàiParaphrase đề, trả lời ngắn gọn cả hai câu hỏi.
  2. Thân bài 1Trả lời câu hỏi thứ nhất, giải thích và ví dụ.
  3. Thân bài 2Trả lời câu hỏi thứ hai, giải thích và ví dụ.
  4. Kết bàiTóm tắt hai câu trả lời.
  • Gạch chân từng câu hỏi trong đề trước khi viết.
  • Mỗi câu hỏi một đoạn thân bài.
  • Bỏ sót một câu hỏi sẽ bị giới hạn điểm Task Response.

Bài mẫu band 6.0

311 từ. Bài đủ ý, bố cục rõ, từ vựng và ngữ pháp ở mức an toàn: đây là mức nhiều bạn cần để đạt mục tiêu 6.0.

The cost of healthcare is rising all the time, and many governments find it difficult to pay for it. Some people think that citizens should pay for their own healthcare by buying private health insurance, while others believe that the government should provide free healthcare for everyone. In this essay, I will discuss both views.

On the one hand, some people believe that people should be responsible for their own health costs. Firstly, this would reduce the pressure on the government budget, so the government could spend more money on other important areas, such as education and transport. Secondly, private health insurance companies and hospitals often provide better and faster services, because they compete with each other for customers. Thirdly, if people have to pay for their own healthcare, they may take better care of their health, for example, by eating healthy food and doing exercise.

On the other hand, many people believe that a free healthcare system for everyone is better. The main reason is that health is a basic human right, and everyone should be able to see a doctor when they are sick, whether they are rich or poor. Many poor people cannot afford private health insurance, so if healthcare is not free, they may not get treatment, and some may even die. In addition, old people and people with serious illnesses often have to pay very high insurance costs. A free healthcare system also helps to protect the whole society, for example, by stopping diseases from spreading.

In my opinion, a comprehensive healthcare system is better, because everyone deserves good medical care. However, people who can afford it could buy private insurance to get extra services, and this can reduce pressure on the public system.

In conclusion, although private health insurance has some advantages, I believe that free healthcare for all is fairer and better for society.

Bài mẫu band 7.0

306 từ. So với bài 6.0: lập luận sâu hơn, từ vựng chính xác và đa dạng hơn, câu phức dùng tự nhiên hơn.

As medical costs continue to rise, many governments are struggling to balance their healthcare budgets. This has led to debate over whether individuals should take full responsibility for their own health costs through private insurance or whether the state should provide a comprehensive, free healthcare system. In my view, although private insurance has some advantages, a universal system is fairer and more effective.

Those who favour private health insurance make several arguments. Firstly, shifting costs to individuals would relieve the financial burden on governments, allowing public funds to be spent on other priorities such as education and infrastructure. Secondly, private healthcare providers, competing for customers, may offer shorter waiting times, more choice and higher standards of service. Thirdly, when people pay directly for their healthcare, they may be more motivated to adopt healthy lifestyles and avoid unnecessary treatment.

However, I believe that the arguments for a comprehensive public system are stronger. The most important is fairness. Illness can affect anyone, and those who are poor, elderly or chronically ill are often the people who most need healthcare but are least able to afford private insurance. In countries that rely heavily on private insurance, such as the United States, millions of people are uninsured or underinsured, and medical bills are a leading cause of personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, universal healthcare benefits society as a whole: it ensures that infectious diseases are treated promptly, keeps the workforce healthy and productive, and allows for preventive care, which is cheaper in the long term. Public systems can also negotiate lower prices for medicines and equipment.

Còn 2 đoạn của bài 7.0 và bài mẫu band 9.0

Đăng nhập miễn phí để đọc trọn bài, so sánh 3 mức band và viết thử ngay trên đề này.

Đọc tiếp trong app