IELTS Writing Task 2 · Two-part question

Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2: Should parents be obliged to immunise their children against childhood diseases?

Đề hai câu hỏi và dạng khác 40 phút · tối thiểu 250 từ Bài mẫu 6.0 Bài mẫu 7.0 Bài mẫu 9.0 trong app

Đề bài

Should parents be obliged to immunise their children against childhood diseases?
Or do individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?

Viết ít nhất 250 từ trong khoảng 40 phút.

Dàn ý gợi ý cho dạng Two-part question

Xem tất cả đề dạng Two-part question →

Đề có hai câu hỏi riêng (ví dụ Why is this happening? Is it a positive development?) hoặc yêu cầu đặc biệt. Phải trả lời đầy đủ cả hai câu hỏi.

  1. Mở bàiParaphrase đề, trả lời ngắn gọn cả hai câu hỏi.
  2. Thân bài 1Trả lời câu hỏi thứ nhất, giải thích và ví dụ.
  3. Thân bài 2Trả lời câu hỏi thứ hai, giải thích và ví dụ.
  4. Kết bàiTóm tắt hai câu trả lời.
  • Gạch chân từng câu hỏi trong đề trước khi viết.
  • Mỗi câu hỏi một đoạn thân bài.
  • Bỏ sót một câu hỏi sẽ bị giới hạn điểm Task Response.

Bài mẫu band 6.0

308 từ. Bài đủ ý, bố cục rõ, từ vựng và ngữ pháp ở mức an toàn: đây là mức nhiều bạn cần để đạt mục tiêu 6.0.

Some people believe that parents should be required by law to vaccinate their children against common childhood diseases, such as measles and polio. Others think that parents should have the right to choose. In my opinion, vaccination should be compulsory, except for children who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons.

On the one hand, some people believe that parents should have the right to choose. They think that parents know what is best for their own children, and the government should not control their decisions. Some parents are also worried about the side effects of vaccines, and some believe that vaccines are against their religion or personal beliefs. They argue that forcing people to vaccinate their children takes away their freedom.

On the other hand, I believe that vaccination should be compulsory for several reasons. Firstly, vaccines are very safe and effective. They have saved millions of lives and almost completely removed some diseases, such as smallpox and polio. Serious side effects are very rare. Secondly, when a child is not vaccinated, it is not only that child who is in danger. The child can spread the disease to other people, such as babies who are too young to be vaccinated, old people and people with weak immune systems. For example, in recent years, there have been outbreaks of measles in some countries because many parents did not vaccinate their children. Thirdly, when most people in a community are vaccinated, diseases cannot spread easily, and everyone is protected. This is called herd immunity.

In my opinion, the government should make vaccination compulsory, but it should also give parents clear information about vaccines so that they understand why they are important.

In conclusion, although parents' freedom is important, I believe that parents should be required to vaccinate their children, because it protects both their children and the whole community.

Bài mẫu band 7.0

319 từ. So với bài 6.0: lập luận sâu hơn, từ vựng chính xác và đa dạng hơn, câu phức dùng tự nhiên hơn.

There is ongoing debate about whether parents should be legally required to immunise their children against common childhood diseases or whether they should have the right to decide for themselves. In my view, immunisation should be compulsory, with exceptions only for genuine medical reasons, because the health of the whole community depends on it.

Those who believe in parental choice raise some understandable concerns. They argue that parents have the right to make decisions about their own children's health, and that compulsory vaccination represents excessive government interference in private family life. Some parents are worried about possible side effects, while others object to vaccination on religious or philosophical grounds. From this perspective, forcing parents to immunise their children violates their personal freedom.

However, I believe that the arguments for compulsory immunisation are far stronger. Firstly, vaccines are among the safest and most effective medical interventions ever developed. They have eradicated smallpox, nearly eliminated polio and dramatically reduced deaths from diseases such as measles, diphtheria and whooping cough. Although minor side effects can occur, serious reactions are extremely rare, and the risks of the diseases themselves are far greater. Secondly, and most importantly, the decision not to vaccinate does not only affect the child concerned. Vaccines protect communities through "herd immunity": when a high proportion of the population is immunised, diseases cannot spread easily, protecting those who cannot be vaccinated, such as newborn babies and people with weakened immune systems. When vaccination rates fall, outbreaks occur, as has happened with measles in several countries in recent years. In this sense, choosing not to vaccinate puts other people's children at risk.

Còn 2 đoạn của bài 7.0 và bài mẫu band 9.0

Đăng nhập miễn phí để đọc trọn bài, so sánh 3 mức band và viết thử ngay trên đề này.

Đọc tiếp trong app